Smith Engineering - Direct Entry Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering at Queen's vs. Civil Engineering at UofT

Civil Engineering at UofT is harder to get into, with a competitive average 1.1 points higher (93.1% vs 92%). Smith Engineering - Direct Entry Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering at Queen's also admits a smaller share of applicants (22% vs 36.1% acceptance rate).

Smith Engineering - Direct Entry Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering

Queen's University

92%
Competitive avg
95.9%
Median accepted

Civil Engineering

University of Toronto

93.1%
Competitive avg
94.2%
Median accepted

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQueen'sUofT
Competitive average92%93.1%
Acceptance rate22%36.1%
Median accepted average (reported)95.9%94.2%
Typical accepted range (reported)94.5–97%92.8–97%
Student reports2416
First-year enrollment80N/A
LocationKingston, ONToronto, ON

Bold values mark the more competitive program on that metric. Reported medians and ranges come from anonymous student submissions to Uniscope; published averages and acceptance rates come from official sources where available.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Smith Engineering - Direct Entry Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering at Queen's harder to get into than Civil Engineering at UofT?

Civil Engineering at UofT is harder to get into, with a competitive average 1.1 points higher (93.1% vs 92%). Smith Engineering - Direct Entry Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering at Queen's also admits a smaller share of applicants (22% vs 36.1% acceptance rate).

What average do you need for Smith Engineering - Direct Entry Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering at Queen's vs Civil Engineering at UofT?

Accepted students reported a median 95.9% average for Smith Engineering - Direct Entry Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering at Queen's and 94.2% for Civil Engineering at UofT. Published competitive averages are 92% and 93.1% respectively.

Which has the higher acceptance rate, Queen's Engineering or UofT Engineering?

Civil Engineering at UofT has the higher acceptance rate (36.1% vs 22%).