Smith Engineering - Direct Entry Computer Engineering at Queen's vs. Mechanical Engineering at UofT

Smith Engineering - Direct Entry Computer Engineering at Queen's and Mechanical Engineering at UofT are similarly competitive, with competitive averages of 92% and 92%. Smith Engineering - Direct Entry Computer Engineering at Queen's also admits a smaller share of applicants (22% vs 24.7% acceptance rate).

Smith Engineering - Direct Entry Computer Engineering

Queen's University

92%
Competitive avg
94.8%
Median accepted

Mechanical Engineering

University of Toronto

92%
Competitive avg
95%
Median accepted

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQueen'sUofT
Competitive average92%92%
Acceptance rate22%24.7%
Median accepted average (reported)94.8%95%
Typical accepted range (reported)93–96.6%94.8–97.3%
Student reports4019
First-year enrollment40N/A
LocationKingston, ONToronto, ON

Bold values mark the more competitive program on that metric. Reported medians and ranges come from anonymous student submissions to Uniscope; published averages and acceptance rates come from official sources where available.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Smith Engineering - Direct Entry Computer Engineering at Queen's harder to get into than Mechanical Engineering at UofT?

Smith Engineering - Direct Entry Computer Engineering at Queen's and Mechanical Engineering at UofT are similarly competitive, with competitive averages of 92% and 92%. Smith Engineering - Direct Entry Computer Engineering at Queen's also admits a smaller share of applicants (22% vs 24.7% acceptance rate).

What average do you need for Smith Engineering - Direct Entry Computer Engineering at Queen's vs Mechanical Engineering at UofT?

Accepted students reported a median 94.8% average for Smith Engineering - Direct Entry Computer Engineering at Queen's and 95% for Mechanical Engineering at UofT. Published competitive averages are 92% and 92% respectively.

Which has the higher acceptance rate, Queen's Engineering or UofT Engineering?

Mechanical Engineering at UofT has the higher acceptance rate (24.7% vs 22%).