Smith Engineering – Common First Year programs at Queen's vs. Nanotechnology Engineering (Co-op Only) at Waterloo

Smith Engineering – Common First Year programs at Queen's and Nanotechnology Engineering (Co-op Only) at Waterloo are similarly competitive, with competitive averages of 88% and 88%.

Smith Engineering – Common First Year programs

Queen's University

88%
Competitive avg
95.7%
Median accepted

Nanotechnology Engineering (Co-op Only)

University of Waterloo

88%
Competitive avg
94%
Median accepted

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQueen'sWaterloo
Competitive average88%88%
Acceptance rate38%38%
Median accepted average (reported)95.7%94%
Typical accepted range (reported)94–97.3%91.3–95.6%
Student reports11622
First-year enrollment80088
LocationKingston, ONWaterloo, ON

Bold values mark the more competitive program on that metric. Reported medians and ranges come from anonymous student submissions to Uniscope; published averages and acceptance rates come from official sources where available.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Smith Engineering – Common First Year programs at Queen's harder to get into than Nanotechnology Engineering (Co-op Only) at Waterloo?

Smith Engineering – Common First Year programs at Queen's and Nanotechnology Engineering (Co-op Only) at Waterloo are similarly competitive, with competitive averages of 88% and 88%.

What average do you need for Smith Engineering – Common First Year programs at Queen's vs Nanotechnology Engineering (Co-op Only) at Waterloo?

Accepted students reported a median 95.7% average for Smith Engineering – Common First Year programs at Queen's and 94% for Nanotechnology Engineering (Co-op Only) at Waterloo. Published competitive averages are 88% and 88% respectively.

Which has the higher acceptance rate, Queen's Engineering or Waterloo Engineering?

Nanotechnology Engineering (Co-op Only) at Waterloo has the higher acceptance rate (38% vs 38%).