Engineering – Aerospace at Carleton vs. Smith Engineering – Common First Year programs at Queen's

Smith Engineering – Common First Year programs at Queen's is harder to get into, with a competitive average 3 points higher (88% vs 85%). Smith Engineering – Common First Year programs at Queen's also admits a smaller share of applicants (38% vs 50% acceptance rate).

Engineering – Aerospace

Carleton University

85%
Competitive avg
93.3%
Median accepted

Smith Engineering – Common First Year programs

Queen's University

88%
Competitive avg
95.7%
Median accepted

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCarletonQueen's
Competitive average85%88%
Acceptance rate50%38%
Median accepted average (reported)93.3%95.7%
Typical accepted range (reported)91–96%94–97.3%
Student reports36116
First-year enrollment1,100800
LocationOttawa, ONKingston, ON

Bold values mark the more competitive program on that metric. Reported medians and ranges come from anonymous student submissions to Uniscope; published averages and acceptance rates come from official sources where available.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Engineering – Aerospace at Carleton harder to get into than Smith Engineering – Common First Year programs at Queen's?

Smith Engineering – Common First Year programs at Queen's is harder to get into, with a competitive average 3 points higher (88% vs 85%). Smith Engineering – Common First Year programs at Queen's also admits a smaller share of applicants (38% vs 50% acceptance rate).

What average do you need for Engineering – Aerospace at Carleton vs Smith Engineering – Common First Year programs at Queen's?

Accepted students reported a median 93.3% average for Engineering – Aerospace at Carleton and 95.7% for Smith Engineering – Common First Year programs at Queen's. Published competitive averages are 85% and 88% respectively.

Which has the higher acceptance rate, Carleton Engineering or Queen's Engineering?

Engineering – Aerospace at Carleton has the higher acceptance rate (50% vs 38%).